Tuesday, 8 July 2014
Saturday, 5 July 2014
The Rabbits
The Rabbits is an award winning
Australian picture book written by John Marsden and illustrated by
Shaun Tan, published in 1998 and it won several awards including the
Aurealis Convener’s Award for Excellence. It is ostensibly aimed at
a child and young adult audience but the complex references are
interesting to adults and initially the artwork contained in the
picture book may have been aimed towards adults.
The Rabbits contains a narrative that
is an allegory of the historical process of Australian colonization,
it is told from a “collective” first person perspective by an
indigenous voice, from the perspective of imagined anthropomorphic
indigenous marsupial possum creatures. The narrative is a “didactic
and spare” (Do Rozario 2011 : 25) (instructive and unelaborated)
description of a gradual invasion by waves of human like rabbit
creatures displacing human like marsupial possum creatures, and the
introduction of new species from the anthropomorphic rabbit’s
original ecosystem. Significantly the narrative does not narrate a
resolution that represents a “cosmic balance” (Do Rozario 2011 :
25), the narrative does not have a happy ending (Do Rozario 2011 :
26), ultimately the story is a narrative of a cosmic imbalance from
the perspective of the narrator. The art work by Shaun Tan gives the
book much of its resonance, the images elaborate and expand the
sparse narrative into ecological and universal dimensions. The images
display an exaggerated nightmarish European culture, in angular
shapes with imperial red, white and gold colour schemes and the
picture books representations of the anthropomorphic marsupial possum
indigenous culture, is in curved shapes with earthy colours that
strongly evokes the art work of Australian Aborigines. There are
clear historical symbols in the picture book and an imagined but
recognisably Australian natural environment that is conveyed more
clearly through displayed images that the sparse collective first
person narrative, “our”, that gives the picture book its
universal and ecological context (Do Rozario 2011 : 25).
The Rabbit Ship from The Rabbits 1998 |
Some of the images are haunting,
especially its interpretation of sheep. Sheep are portrayed in an
uncanny way as essentially mouths attached to woolly bodies and are
associated with the action of voracious chewing, the image of teeth
is described by Dianne McGlasson (2013) as being a significant
metaphor and uses Julia Kristeva’s theory of abjection to interpret
the images. Abjection means a state of being “cast off” and many
of Shaun Tan’s images of childhood contain a state of abjection
where the subject is situated as separate from the dominant symbolic
order. Kristeva’s theory of abjection has the subject, the abject
being traumatically separated from the symbolic order, thus the
subject is no longer the subject of that order but is the abjected.
The abject complements the superego, which is formed from the
dominant discourse, representative of culture, the symbolic order.
The abjected is prelanguage before being incorporated into language
by the Symbolic order thus is described as being Semiotic, belonging
to a preoedipal stage (McGlasson 2013 : 21).
McGlasson (2013) describes symbols as
masculine because they are associated with the super ego, a symbolic
order developed from a (masculine) dominant discourse and describes
the semiotic as maternal because they are counter to the dominant
discourse and thus have an abject state. Although this interpretation
can be disputed, part of the beauty of art is that it can have
different meanings dependant on the interpretation of its audience.
There is an uncanny and political content in Shaun Tan’s artwork in
The Rabbits that can be subjected to the interpretative
orientations of its audience and it is possible that McGlasson (2013)
may be, to a degree, right, in the sense that discourse can be
contested along various intersections of privilege and gender is one
intersection. Uncontentiously the images of teeth in The Rabbits,
such as those of the sheep are removed from their normal place
(McGlasson 2013 : 23), in the sense they are disproportionately large,
over exposed and not associated with a smile display and thus are
abject, “objects of horror, revulsion and distaste” (McGlasson
2013 : 23).
The Sheep from The Rabbits 1998 |
The anthropomorphic marsupial possum creatures are abjected in the picture book in the sense that they are oppressed, exploited and betrayed by the colonizing rabbits, the narrative represents the process of colonization as wrong (McGlasson 2013 : 24). There are multiple representations of process, the colonizing machines & animals engorge, process and eliminate and the text is accompanied by images of stages of a colonization process and the wrongness of these processes are demonstrated by images of the abject and uncanny, such as the images that feature teeth, as agents of abjection.
Similarly, the pictures in the picture
book are argued as being abject because they critique the dominant
historical discourse. The images in critiquing the process of
colonization disturb conventional identity and cultural concepts,
disrupting the assumption of degrees of “terra nullis”, not total
emptiness, because that the aborigines were originally there is not
under dispute, but the historical dominant discourse can be argued to
contain the assumption that they weren’t really “using” the
land, a psychological “terra nullis” (McGlasson 2013 : 20).
Bibliography
McGlasson, Dianne. (2013). A Toothy
Tale : Themes of Abjection in John Marsden and Shaun Tans Picture
Story Book, The Rabbits. In Lion and the Unicorn, Volume 37,
Number 1, January 2013. Pages 20-36.
Do Rozario, Rebecca-Anne. (2011).
Australia’s Fairy Tales Illustrated in Print : Instances of
Indigeneity, Colonization, and Suburbanization. In Marvels &
Tales: Journal of Fairy-Tale Studies, Volume 25, Number 1 (2011).
Pages 13-32. Published by Wayne State University Press, Detroit.
Interesting sites
John Marsden's Home site mostly advertising the "Tomorrow" series of young adult books
Youtube video of Shaun Tan in an interview "Do you encourage open interpretation of your work?"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)